Search

Corporate Governance Report and Declaration of Corporate Governance pursuant to section 289f of the HGB

Responsible corporate governance that is geared to sustained value creation and preservation is the benchmark of all actions of the Executive Board and Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG and the cornerstone of the Company’s success. The following is the Executive Board’s and Supervisory Boards’ report on corporate governance at RATIONAL in accordance with our corporate governance principles, number 3.10 of the German Corporate Governance Code and section 289f of the Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB, German Commercial Code). The report is supplemented by the remuneration report, which is part of the Company’s management report.

Key corporate governance practices and compliance

Responsible, sustainable, and socially aware actions have always been a basic element of the corporate culture of RATIONAL AG. This also includes integrity in dealings with customers, employees, business partners, shareholders, and the public.

By compliance, RATIONAL understands adherence to legislation, laws and the Articles of Association, together with observance of other internal regulations. In addition, RATIONAL AG continued to develop its own corporate governance in fiscal year 2017, which largely complies with the rules of the Code as amended and published in the Federal Gazette on 24 April 2017. There are no other voluntary commitments to comply with external codes and regulations. The Company has developed a comprehensive philosophy and has management principles that are set down in writing. It also has a Code of Conduct that applies throughout the Group. The corporate philosophy stresses the self-image of the Company, its executive bodies and its employees. It can be found on the RATIONAL website under “Company/About_us/Corporate_philosophy”. There are also recommendations on how to behave in dealings with customers, partners and colleagues.

To ensure compliance throughout the Group with the requirements of the law and with the Company’s internal guidelines, RATIONAL AG began to set up a compliance organisation in fiscal year 2012. The starting point for compliance activities is the RATIONAL AG Code of Conduct, which has been summarised in the form of RATIONAL Rules of Conduct in Business and communicated throughout the Company.

The RATIONAL compliance team was set up in 2013, and a Compliance Officer was appointed for the entire RATIONAL Group. On the basis of the results of compliance risk analyses carried out in different company divisions, actions were defined to counter all material compliance risks. In addition to applicable internal compliance rules, these measures also include cooperation with qualified local partners. Moreover, the local requirements for a compliance programme are continuously monitored in countries where RATIONAL has its own subsidiaries and employees and, where necessary, adapted to the existing compliance programme.

In 2015, an independent auditing company was commissioned by RATIONAL AG to audit the risk management system as well as the design of the compliance management system in accordance with the auditing standards of the Institute of Public Auditors in Germany (Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer in Deutschland, IDW). The functional capability of both systems was hereby confirmed. The compliance management system and the risk management system were strategically continued in fiscal year 2017 on the basis of the existing concepts.

In addition, an e-learning tool for compliance topics specifically developed for the requirements of the RATIONAL Group was implemented in fiscal year 2016 and enhanced in 2017. All employees of the RATIONAL Group have to successfully complete a course using this tool once a year.

Shareholders and General Meeting of Shareholders.

The General Meeting of Shareholders is chaired by the Chairman of the Supervisory Board or another member of the Supervisory Board appointed by the Chairman.

Around 600 shareholders, representatives of the press and guests attended the General Meeting of Shareholders in Augsburg on 3 May 2017. An imputed 93% of the share capital was represented. All resolutions on the agenda were approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders with a large majority.

Management bodies of the Company.

RATIONAL AG is an Aktiengesellschaft (joint stock corporation) under German law. A basic principle of German corporation law is the dual system of management, comprising an executive board and a supervisory board, each of which has its own autonomous areas of responsibility.

Cooperation between Executive Board and Supervisory Board

The Executive Board and Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG cooperate closely and on a basis of trust in the management and monitoring of the Company. Full details of the cooperation between the Executive Board and the Supervisory Board are given in the Supervisory Board’s report.

The Executive Board and its working methods

The members of the Executive Board bear joint responsibility for the overall management of the Company. They cooperate closely with one another and exchange information about important actions and procedures taking place within their divisions. Each member of the Executive Board is responsible for the divisions assigned to them on the basis of Executive Board resolutions. The Executive Board generally reaches decisions in meetings, which are held every two weeks. In addition, every member of the Executive Board can call a meeting by announcing the item on the agenda. Likewise, every member can request that a topic be included in the agenda for a meeting. The Executive Board reaches decisions in meetings by a simple majority of votes cast or, outside of meetings, by a simple majority of its members.

The Executive Board keeps the Supervisory Board comprehensively informed in good time, verbally and in writing as well as in regular meetings about planning, business development and the position of the Company, including risk management.

Composition of the Executive Board

The Executive Board of RATIONAL AG can consist of one or more persons. It had four members as at the balance sheet date. The assignment of division responsibility to the individual members is detailed in the executive organisation chart. The members of the Executive Board are Dr Peter Stadelmann (Chief Executive Officer, Chief Human Resources Officer), Peter Wiedemann (Chief Technical Officer), Dr Axel Kaufmann (Chief Financial Officer) and Markus Paschmann (Chief Sales Officer).

The members of the Executive Board do not perform any Supervisory Board duties in other listed companies.

No conflicts of interest occurred in the past fiscal year.

The Supervisory Board and its working methods

The Supervisory Board advises and monitors the Executive Board in the management of the Company. It is involved in strategy and planning as well as in all matters of fundamental importance for the Company. For significant business transactions — such as the annual planning and major investments — the Supervisory Board may exercise its right to veto stipulated in the rules of procedure for the Executive Board. The Chairman of the Supervisory Board coordinates the work in the Supervisory Board, chairs its meetings and looks after the interests of the Board in its external dealings.

In the case of significant events, an extraordinary meeting of the Supervisory Board is convened if necessary. For its work, the Supervisory Board has set itself rules of procedure.

Details of the focus of the Supervisory Board’s activities and advice in the year under review are given in the Report by the Supervisory Board.

Formation of Supervisory Board committees.

Following its enlargement to six members by resolution of the 2015 General Meeting of Shareholders, the Supervisory Board has established an Audit Committee. Its members are Mr Walter Kurtz, Dr Hans Maerz and Mr Erich Baumgärtner. The Supervisory Board does not believe that the establishment of a nomination committee is necessary. With a six-member Supervisory Board, efficient discussions and intense exchanges of views on suitable candidates for nomination by the Supervisory Board to the General Meeting of Shareholders can also be held in the plenary session. Moreover, the fact that the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG is not subject to co-determination obviates the need to form a nomination committee that consists exclusively of shareholder representatives.

Right to appoint for members of the Supervisory Board.

By resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders on 29 April 2015, article 8 (6) sentence 1 of the Articles of Association of RATIONAL AG was amended. The wording of the resolution is as follows: “For as long as Mr Siegfried Meister and Mr Walter Kurtz are shareholders of the company they shall have the joint right to appoint up to two members of the Supervisory Board. If one of the two holders of the right to appoint ceases to be a shareholder of the company, the remaining shareholder shall have the sole right to appoint. The right to appoint shall be exercised by submitting a written declaration to the Executive Board of the company.”

Composition of the Supervisory Board.

Under the Articles of Association, as amended by resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders on 29 April 2015, the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG has six members, who are elected by the shareholders.

The Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG has unanimously elected Walter Kurtz as its new Chairman. The election was necessary since the company founder and former Supervisory Board Chairman Siegfried Meister died on 28 July 2017 at the age of 78.

Mr Walter Kurtz is the Chairman of the Supervisory Board and Dr Hans Maerz is his deputy. Also on the Supervisory Board are Mr Erich Baumgärtner, Dr Gerd Lintz and Mr Werner Schwind, proven experts in finance, business law and sales.

In accordance with his right of delegation under the Articles of Association, Mr Walter Kurtz appointed Dr Georg Sick to the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG with effect from 18 October 2017 until the next Supervisory Board elections by the General Meeting of Shareholders in 2019. The Company has thus filled the Supervisory Board position that became vacant due to the death of Siegfried Meister within the specified period. With his many years of experience in managerial technical positions for a family-managed, medium- sized company, he will complement the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG as a proven technical expert, thus rounding out its skills profile.

This body has five independent members (Dr Hans Maerz, Mr Erich Baumgärtner, Dr Gerd Lintz, Mr Werner Schwind and Dr Georg Sick) who have no material business or personal relationship with the Company or its Executive Board, and the Supervisory Board considers this to be a sufficient number. The term of office of the Supervisory Board is five years. The current term of office will expire at the ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders in 2019.

Supervisory Board members are proposed for election exclusively on the basis of their special skills and qualifications. Other attributes, such as gender, age, nationality or length of membership of the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG, have not been and will not be of any consequence for this decision. The Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG has set itself a target concerning the proportion of women in the Supervisory Board within the meaning of the German Act on Equal Participation of Women and Men in Executive Positions in the Private and the Public Sector (Gesetz für die gleichberechtigte Teilhabe von Frauen und Männern an Führungspositionen in der Privatwirtschaft und im öffentlichen Dienst) and has published this target in this report (see below). Beyond that, the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG will not set any concrete objectives for its composition in accordance with number 5.4.1 (2) of the German Corporate Governance Code and will not report on this in the Declaration of Corporate Governance in accordance with number 5.4.1 (3) of the Code.

No conflicts of interest occurred in the past fiscal year.

Definition relating to the participation of women in executive positions in accordance with sections 76 (4) and 111 (5) of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz)

RATIONAL AG is a listed company, but is not subject to parity co-determination. This means that, under the German Act on Equal Participation of Women and Men in Executive Positions in the Private and the Public Sector, the introduction of a 30% ratio for women in the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG is not binding. However, the Company’s listing on the stock exchange requires the Company to specify targets for increasing the percentage of women in the Supervisory Board, Executive Board and on the two management levels below the Executive Board as well as to set deadlines for attaining these targets.

The review of whether the target for the percentage of women in executive positions has been met as at the deadline on 30 June 2017 revealed that, at 11.1%, the target quota of 12.5% women on the first management level below the Executive Board had not been met. In all other respects, RATIONAL AG met the set target quotas by the deadline on 30 June 2017.

The reason for falling short of the target quota on the first management level below the Executive Board is that, as a result of the changes in the Executive Board in 2016, the Finance division was restructured. This reorganisation has resulted in two more male managers reporting directly to the Chief Financial Officer. The positions and functions of the two female managers have not changed, while the total number of managers on the first level below the Executive Board has increased. As a result, the target quota of 12.5% women, which corresponded to the status quo at the time the target was set, was not met.

The Executive Board and Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG have set themselves the following new targets for the proportion of women in executive positions, thereby meeting their legal obligations:

  • For the Supervisory Board, a target of 0% has been specified for the proportion of women.
  • For the Executive Board, a target of 0% has been specified for the proportion of women.
  • For the first management level below the Executive Board, a target of 16.7% (previously 12.5%) has been specified for the proportion of women.
  • For the second management level below the Executive Board, a target of 30.0% has been specified for the proportion of women.
  • The deadline for meeting these targets is 30 June 2022.

Accounting and auditing

On 3 May 2017, the General Meeting of Shareholders appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Munich, as auditors of the financial statements and the consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2017. The audit contract was awarded by the Supervisory Board.

Prior to the proposal being submitted to the General Meeting of Shareholders, the Supervisory Board obtained a declaration from the auditors on their personal and business relationships with the Company. This gave no rise to any objections. The Supervisory Board agreed with the auditors that the Chairman of the Supervisory Board would be notified immediately about disqualification or reasons for bias during the audit.

The auditors are additionally required to report separately on any major weaknesses detected during the audit in the accounting-related internal control and risk management system.

The responsible auditor of the 2017 annual financial statements was Mr Dietmar Eglauer.

Dependent company report.

The Executive Board issued a dependent company report pursuant to section 312 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz, AktG). The auditors raised no objections to the dependent company report following the audit. Likewise, the Supervisory Board stated after examining the dependent company report that there are no objections to the declaration by the Executive Board at the end of the dependent company report.

Declaration in accordance with section 161 of the AktG and declaration of conformity with the German Corporate Governance Code

The Executive Board and the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG, Landsberg am Lech, hereby declare in accordance with section 161 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz, AktG) that, since the last declaration of conformity was submitted in January 2017, the recommendations of the Government Commission for a German Corporate Governance Code (as amended and published in the Federal Gazette on 24 April 2017) have been and are being complied with, with the following exceptions:

Number 4.2.3 (2) sentence 3 of the Code:

Number 4.2.3: “Variable remuneration components generally have a multiple-year assessment basis that shall have essentially forward-looking characteristics.”

The variable components of Executive Board remuneration as agreed in the existing employment contracts with members of the Executive Board comprise various elements of the company’s long-term success, but do not specifically stipulate a multi-year assessment basis. The Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG regards sustainable company development as a matter of course. In a continuous process, a medium-term plan is prepared on the basis of the corporate strategy, and the annual benchmarks for determining the variable remuneration components of the members of the Executive Board are derived from this plan.

Numbers 4.2.4 and 4.2.5 of the Code:

Number 4.2.4: “The total remuneration of every Management Board member is to be disclosed, indicating their name, and classified by fixed and variable remuneration components. The same applies to benefit commitments granted to Management Board members in the event of early or regular termination of Management Board activity, and to benefit commitments amended during the respective financial year. There is no disclosure, if the General Meeting resolves this with a three-quarters majority.”

Number 4.2.5: “Management Board remuneration is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements or the management report. The remuneration report, which is part of the management report, describes the principal features of the Management Board remuneration system. The description shall be made in a generally comprehensible way.

The remuneration report shall also include information on the nature of the fringe benefits provided by the corporation.

In addition, the remuneration report shall present the following information for every Management Board member:

  • the benefits granted for the reporting period, including fringe benefits, supplemented in the case of variable remuneration components by the maximum and minimum remuneration achievable,
  • the benefits received for the reporting period, consisting of fixed remuneration, short-term variable remuneration and long-term variable remuneration, broken down by the relevant reference years,
  • the service cost incurred in/for the reporting period for pension benefits and other commitments.

The model tables provided as appendices to this document shall be used to disclose this information.”

On 4 May 2016 the General Meeting of Shareholders of RATIONAL AG resolved to dispense with the publication of individualised figures for Executive Board remuneration in accordance with section 286 (5) of the Handelsgesetzbuch (HGB, German Commercial Code). This resolution of the General Meeting will be in effect for five years. Disclosure of the variable remuneration broken down by short-term and long-term components will not be made.

Numbers 5.1.2 (1) sentence 2 and 5.1.2 (2) sentence 3 of the Code:

Number 5.1.2 (1) sentence 2: “When appointing Management Board members, the Supervisory Board shall take diversity into account.”

Number 5.1.2 (2) sentence 3: “The Supervisory Board shall specify an age limit for the members of the Management Board.”

The Supervisory Board and Executive Board expressly welcome all efforts to counter any form of discrimination and to promote diversity in a reasonable manner. When appointing members of the Executive Board, the special skills and qualifications of the candidate are the only decisive criterion for the Supervisory Board. Other attributes such as gender or national identity have not been and will not be of any consequence for this decision.

No age limit has been specified for members of the Executive Board, and the Supervisory Board believes that this would not be in the interest of the Company. Executive Board members are appointed solely on the basis of their ability to run the Company successfully. Just because someone reaches a specific age does not generally mean that he or she loses this ability. Moreover, a rigid age limit could be discriminatory.

Number 5.3.3 of the Code (Formation of committees):

“The Supervisory Board shall form a Nomination Committee, composed exclusively of shareholder representatives, which proposes suitable candidates to the Supervisory Board for its recommendations to the General Meeting.”

Following its enlargement to six members by resolution of the 2015 General Meeting of Shareholders, the Supervisory Board has established an Audit Committee. The Supervisory Board does not believe that the establishment of a nomination committee is necessary. With a six-member Supervisory Board, efficient discussions and intense exchanges of views on suitable candidates for nomination by the Supervisory Board to the General Meeting of Shareholders can also be held in the plenary session. Moreover, the fact that the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG is not subject to codetermination obviates the need to form a nomination committee that consists exclusively of shareholder representatives.

Number 5.4.1 (2) sentences 1 and 2 and (4) sentences 1 and 2 of the Code:

Number 5.4.1 (2) sentence 1: “The Supervisory Board shall determine concrete objectives regarding its composition, and shall prepare a profile of skills and expertise for the entire Board.”

Number 5.4.1 (2) sentence 2: “Within the company-specific situation the composition of the Supervisory Board shall reflect appropriately the international activities of the company, potential conflicts of interest, the number of independent Supervisory Board members within the meaning of number 5.4.2, an age limit and a regular limit to Supervisory Board members’ term of office, both to be specified, as well as diversity.”

Number 5.4.1 (4) sentence 1: “Proposals by the Supervisory Board to the General Meeting shall take these targets into account, while simultaneously aiming at fulfilling the overall profile of required skills and expertise of the Supervisory Board.”

Number 5.4.1 (4) sentence 2: “The implementation status shall be published in the Corporate Governance Report.”

The composition of the Supervisory Board of RATIONAL AG is guided by the Company’s interests and guarantees that the Executive Board is effectively monitored and advised. The candidates for election to the Supervisory Board are selected exclusively on the basis of knowledge, skills and experience. Other attributes such as gender or national identity have not been and will not be of any consequence. No age limit has been specified for Supervisory Board members, nor has a regular limit of length of membership of the Supervisory Board. Nominations to the General Meeting of Shareholders are based exclusively on the knowledge, skills and experience of the candidates in question. The intention is to continue to abide by this policy in future in order to retain experience and skills for the benefit of the Company.

Landsberg, February 2018
RATIONAL Aktiengesellschaft

Corporate governance.

Back to corporate governance
Image

Contact

For additional information, please contact us at:

(888) 320-7274 Callback service Contact us
Image

ChefLine

If you have any application questions, you can call upon the experience of our RATIONAL master chefs 365 days a year.

866-306-CHEF (2433) Contact us
Image

You will find your RATIONAL dealer in its vicinity when you either type in your postal code or your city.

Please enter your location:

Search
Image

Service

Our professional and responsive network of RATIONAL Service Partners are here to support you. Find your local RATIONAL Service Partner:

Search
Contact us